<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retro HTML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://todd-a.com/2008/07/07/retro-html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://todd-a.com/2008/07/07/retro-html/</link>
	<description>code words</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:55:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EA</title>
		<link>http://todd-a.com/2008/07/07/retro-html/comment-page-1/#comment-4964</link>
		<dc:creator>EA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandwichesandapples.org/?p=1519#comment-4964</guid>
		<description>&quot;I suppose one solution is to raise fees for service to out-dated websites.&quot;

Why not?!  After all mechanics charge a premium for working on classic cars, why can&#039;t we do the same?  Working on older sites are definitely a pain in the ass when you consider that their usually table based **** balls.  I for one, would charge 5x if the site&#039;s in tables.  But that&#039;s just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I suppose one solution is to raise fees for service to out-dated websites.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why not?!  After all mechanics charge a premium for working on classic cars, why can&#8217;t we do the same?  Working on older sites are definitely a pain in the ass when you consider that their usually table based **** balls.  I for one, would charge 5x if the site&#8217;s in tables.  But that&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
